Editor: One could easily write much in favor of Rep. Sherrie Sprenger, about her concern toward and for the people of Oregon, most importantly families who have difficulty in supporting their children and perhaps elder parents who live with them, and how Sherrie’s efforts ended in vain because of a “Green-Controlled Machine,” which showed no concern nor interest in the clear lack of jobs, which people need. the jobs are more important than Al Gore’s greenhouse illusion, but make-believe rules in the ignorance of the legislator. As for any worthwhile comments for Phil Barnhart, U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and Gov. Ted Kulongoski, forget it. Elsewhere, it is a disgrace and shame the way Obama is treating Hillary Clinton, the secretary of state, letting Hillary do nothing important, just more wild goose-chasing. Oh well, such are the results of “change.” Hillary should leave her job and start a second campaign for the winning of the 2012 presidency. Hillary could run as an independent, giving her total freedom from the socialists who control the Democratic Party, whereby permitting Hillary to become the first female president – something long overdue. I do not doubt that Hillary would surely be elected since female voters would have to support her because of the opportunity to achieve that lifelong dream. Back to square one. Question: Whose side are you on when it comes to the government of the people? To whose views among Rep. Sherrie Sprenger, Rep. Phil Barnhart, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and Gov. Ted Kulongoski do you follow? Are you - With the lambs or the wolves? - With the people or the government? - The hardcore oppressors or the defender? Surely, there isn’t any reason that you would refuse to respond to the above questions in an upcoming newsroom shot, would you?