Editor:
Research, people! Just because your opinion is printed in a letter to the editor does not mean that it is correct!
Granted, the self-proclaimed “newcomer” may have an excuse for lack of knowledge, but not someone who has been around and has personally used the benefits of having SHEDG in our community.
I am embarrassed for narrow-minded people who choose to formulate an opinion (and share it with others) without checking the facts. I am specifically referring to the ridiculous statement that SHEDG “has shown little concern for the community for which it is named”. Possibly, a little enlightenment is in order.
First of all, The Oregon Jamboree pays thousands of dollars each year for three to five days usage of school district property, as well as paying for any necessary repairs resulting from festival wear and tear. Those are additional funds earned during the summer when the facilities would be otherwise unused.
Second, since 2001 SHEDG has donated over $168,000 to various Sweet Home organizations and committees. Those donations include specific projects such as the Weddle Bridge project, Shea Point Restrooms, the median strip improvements and Downtown Façade Improvement Grants (which help private business owners).
In addition, the Sweet Home Rodeo sought help from SHEDG through a financially difficult time, and the volunteer firefighters received $5,000 towards the fireworks display.
Furthermore, SHEDG does not forget about the individuals who help with the Jamboree. Each year every volunteer receives free entry to the festival plus the opportunity to purchase additional tickets at a reduced price. They receive a free t-shirt, plus the opportunity to purchase sweatshirts and other Jamboree items at reduced prices. They are also invited to pre- and post-festival appreciation parties.
FYI, a volunteer, by definition, is someone who offers their service of their own free will. Generally, volunteers do not expect to receive anything in return.
With specific regard to the offer made to District 55, SHEDG would be giving the district $25,000 this year. Not loaning – giving! In return, the district would agree to remove the tennis courts. Why would anyone turn down a gift like that?
If they choose not to get matching funds (which would have totalled another $150,000) they would still get to keep the original gift.
Look at it this way. Two of the tennis courts are already condemned. That means they can not be used by the school district unless they are replaced or repaired. Without SHEDG’s offer, the district would have to go without or replace the courts solely at district expense.
The school board is basically saying that they would rather go without the use of the tennis courts than accept the gift. The result will be an ongoing liability for defunct tennis courts which serve no purpose at all.
Did any of the board members think to ask the soccer, softball, football or baseball coaching staff their opinions?
Take a look at the fields surrounding the tennis courts during a season when any of those sports are active.
There is precious little area not in use. However, the tennis courts are rarely occupied. I imagine the teams would jump at the chance for additional field space.
I, for one, would encourage the school board to reconsider SHEDG’s offer. One would think that educated leaders would embrace any opportunity based on a sound business offer.
Carlene Erickson
Sweet Home