Editor:
The president may call it workplace violence but I know this: Fort Hood and Boston were clearly acts of terror by Islamic terrorists. And why not? Read on.
The U.S. has not declared war on ISIS. Nor, as far as I know, has the U.N. There is nothing in the Constitution or our laws that allows the president to order assassinations. Yet, without such authorization, using manned planes and drones, the president has routinely ordered such actions of key Isis leaders.
The premier act was the killing of Osama bin Laden. I understand the president was practically forced to order the raid and specified that he was NOT to be captured (Seal Team testimony) but killed. The proof of this advance order is that a Muslim cleric was propositioned on an aircraft carrier conveniently located to receive the returning helicopter.
The question is, why was his death necessary? Why was the funereal pre-planned? If you can return a body then you can return the man! Obviously, the President wanted him dead and that begs the question – why?
The president travelled to the Near East as a poor student and returned with what seemingly was a new identity. Apparently, there is no record and no one recalls his attendance but he attended some of the most expensive universities in the U.S.
It’s admittedly a stretch, but could he have met bin Laden there, who then financed his further actions? I don’t know, but it would explain a lot of the unknowns about the president and why he ordered this death and disposal.
You tell me.
William C. Curtis
Sweet Home